![]() ![]() The lack of a mouse interface to send slew commands to the telescope means you have to use the keyboard's hotkeys (CTRL-1 slews Telescope #1 to the currently selected point). It doesn't support ASCOM for total observatory integration, but it does support a number of telescopes, including CelestronSky-Watcher and Meade. The computerized telescope support is lacking. I use the angle tool, computerized telescope support, and ocular extensively. Stellarium can be extended with plugins, and comes with several out of the starting gate. What it does do, it does relatively well. ![]() There are a lot of times when you don't want to wait for Starry Night Pro and all it's features to load just to discover where a particular planet is located. ![]() It's rather short of features, compared with commercial programs like Starry Night Pro. And when searching for that name in the desktop version, I get zero results.įorgive me if this is a beginner question, and I'm missing something fundamental.Įdited by aram12, 25 August 2020 - 05:35 PM.Stellarium is short and sweet, to the point, just the way I like an application. But there is no such designation in the desktop version. The naming convention between both versions of the software also confuses me. I also seem to be seeing a completely different set of stars around Albaldah from each version of the software. But the desktop version never resolves the double star. For example, I can "zoom in" and resolve Albaldah into a double star at around FOV. Up to 18 I believe.īut it still seems that Stellarium web can "see further" as it were. Mucking about with Stellarium I was confused at first that there the sky wasn't as populated in the desktop version (vs the web), but then found the "packs" needed to load the higher magnitude stars. Just started my journey down the Astronomy hole, as it were. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |